Commentaries on 2 Peter/Jude

The best option on a pair of texts which get less attention. more

 . more

One of the most often-cited commentaries on the epistles, and justly so; worthy of being on this list although it is now somewhat dated. more

While Bauckham’s commentary is not quite the consensus favorite, it is unanimously held up as a brilliant and helpful treatment. more

This commentary is the most important contribution on these two letters in modern times. more

As with Peter Davids' other well known commentaries on the catholic epistles (James in NIGTC, and 1 Peter in NICNT) he is able to balance critical scholarship with pastoral relevance and clear exposition. more

I just received this commentary and although I have not read all of the commentary as of yet, I wanted to state clearly that Davids supports traditional authorship of both books, ultimately concluding that there is not enough evidence to overturn Petrine authorship of 2 Peter. more

Perhaps the most popular academic commentary on the epistles; recommended by Clint Arnold, Jerome Neyrey, Seyoon Kim, and Ralph P. more

Those who do not pick up either Bauckham or Green as their first choice for 1 Peter and Jude will doubtless turn to Davids and his contribution to the PNTC. more

This commentary begins with Jude (despite the title!), a letter which may have been written by Jesus’ brother, but Davids does not find compelling evidence for this. more

For 1 Peter and Jude, Schreiner was so helpful(haven't read 2 Pet. more

There appears to be a strong selection of excellent commentaries on 1 Peter and most of the experts rate Schreiner’s at or very near the top. more

While this volume covers 2 Peter and Jude as well, Schreiner’s commentary is worth reading as an example of evangelical scholarship. more

My biggest complaint with this entire series is that usually a passage is treated to briefly to be of any real help. more

I read Schreiner's comments on 1&2 Peter, and they were superb. more