Commentaries on 1/2 Kings

I absolutely love the NAC series, but House's commentary on First and Second Kings was poor. more

House’s commentary is widely praised and finds its way onto almost every one of the experts’ lists. more

One of the best intermediate level commentaries on the books of 1 & 2 Kings is the commentary by Paul R. more

House is good, but not outstanding. more

Evangelical theological and literary synthesis of recent approaches. more

In the limited space this series offers, Provan has judiciously selected and commented on the most pertinent textual and theological issues arising in Kings. more

Provan receives the only 5-star recommendation from Tremper Longman who says, “The writing is accessible, and the emphasis is on literary and theological issues, though the notes also address particular exegetical issues. more

Enjoyed this commentary very much. more

This commentary is short but is helpful and insightful in spots. more

Provan's commentary on Kings in the NIBC series may be the best individual contribution to that series. more

Who edits the editor? Dr. more

Wiseman is known and appreciated for his extensive scholarship in Near Eastern literature and archaeology and those interests represent the greatest strengths in his volume on 1 & 2 Kings. more

Wiseman's contribution to the Tyndale series is another strong contribution. more

Evangelical application of archaeological and historical studies to the interpretation and application of the message of Kings. more