Ostrobothnia Bible School

This commentary is overvalued. Many of my fellow scholars recommended so I expected much more. His argument for the book is spiritual wholeness but an argument consists of many contradictions. He mixes justification and sanctification consistently. Sometimes wholeness is a goal of Christian life sometimes it is a proof of true Christianity. It seems to me that he has not found the intrinsic genre of the book. Secondary sources have been limited to very narrow spectrum of theology. His exegesis should interact more with the text and technical aspect of the commentary fall short.