Ezra-Nehemiah
Ezra-Nehemiah
Technical
Critical

Ezra-Nehemiah

in Word Biblical Commentary

by H. G. M. Williamson

4.82 Rank Score: 7.1 from 14 reviews, 8 featured collections, and 20 user libraries
Pages 476
Publisher Thomas Nelson
Published 1985
ISBN-13 9780849902154

Collections

This book appears in the following featured collections.

Reviews

Add Your Review

Carlos Baner Carlos Baner November 21, 2019
very important
G Ware G Ware May 24, 2018
The three commentaries on Ezra-Nehemiah I rely on (Williamson, Fensham, Blenkinsopp) were all published around the same time, but still hold up quite well. Williamson is the most technical of the three. If you are willing to work with the somewhat annoying WBC format, this is a wonderful commentary, especially the introduction, which is surprisingly short for a technical commentary (roughly 30 pages) but distilled well, avoiding speculative tangents.
Princeton Seminary Princeton Seminary January 5, 2018
offers an excellent interpretation of these books, with thorough discussion of contemporary scholarship
Princeton Seminary Princeton Seminary January 5, 2018
 
Tim Challies Tim Challies August 5, 2013
There is not only near-consensus on the best commentary on Ezra and Nehemiah, but also near-consensus on the second best–Williamson’s contribution to the WBC. Williamson takes a more scholarly and technical approach than Fensham, making this a little bit more difficult to read. His strength is in word study, background, customs and the like. With Fensham this should make a pretty good one-two punch in understanding and interpreting the text. [Full Review]
John Glynn John Glynn September 20, 2008
Jim Rosscup Jim Rosscup September 20, 2008
Williamson's commentary is a scholarly standard on these books and should be consulted in conjunction with Fensham's work. There is more technical information in Williamson's work, but it is less user friendly due to the cumbersome format of the WBC. [Full Review]
A judicious survey of the historical and major exegetical issues with an awareness of the archaeological component. [Full Review]
Unattributed-m Unattributed-m May 27, 2008
Unnatributed-d Unnatributed-d May 26, 2008