This commentary is best for its literary analysis. In studying Luke I consistently found his detailed notes on the text itself very helpful. That is surprising since often that is the part of commentaries I skip. The author himself wrote in his introduction that this was indeed the void he was primarily trying to fill in writing this commentary. The commentary itself is uneven. For some passages I found very helpful insights and summaries. But there were many where he digressed into Luke's sources and then ended up commenting little on the text itself. I have been disappointed in most commentaries on Luke, this one however serves an important purpose and is recommended.

[Full Review]

[Full Review]