I was a little disappointed in this commentary. Not that he did not have some good insights, but for the series it is in, I was surprised at how much time he spent on supposed “problems” in the texts. Indeed, he spends more time on them than many of the longer commentaries I have. His critical comments would have been much better left for a longer commentary and more time should have been spend on good explanation and application of the text as we have it. Not a book I would go out and buy, but if you have it, it is worth referencing at times.