[Full Review]

[Full Review]

Asbury Theological Seminary Wilmore, KY 40390-1199 The publication of any study on the Gospel of Luke by Franois Bovon would be a much-anticipated event, given the longevity of his work and significance of his contribution to Lukan research. Generations of students have been ably guided through the first decades of Lukes em ergence as a theologian by Bovons Luke the Theologian: Thirty-Three Years of Research (1950-1983) (Pickwick, 1987). That this latest publication is a full-scale, critical commentary on the Third Gospel is all the more welcome. Those of us familiar with Bovons multivolume contribution to the Evangelish-Katholischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament, Das Evangelium nach Lukas (Zrich: Benziger; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1989), will co me to this first volume on Luke in the Hermeneia series with appetites whetted. The German commentary, which is now complete through Luke 19:27, has already demonstrated Bovons gifts as a c areful reader of Luke, along with the depth and breadth of his grasp of issues pertinent to the exegesis of this Gospel. It may be enough simply to celebrate the rendering of Bovons original into English, but I must confess to my disappointment that what we have before us is just that, a translation of a 1989 publication. As Bovon admits in his preface, I was not able or willing to look backward (Luke 9:62!) to update this volumea defensi ble decision, to be sure, given how quickly one can be overcome by the torrents of secondary literature, but a regrettable one nonetheless. [Full Review]

$59.00, ISBN 0800660447. Robert C Tannehill Methodist Theological School in Ohio Delaware, OH 43015 This is the first volume of a multi-volume commentary originally published as Das Evangelium nach Lukas (EKKNT III/1. Zürich: Benziger Verlag & Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1989) and now available in English in the Hermeneia commentary series. François Bovon is widely recognized as a leading Lukan scholar. He was formerly Professor at the University of Geneva and is now Frothingham Professor of the History of Religion at Harvard Divinity School. Two further volumes have been published in German, carrying the commentary through Luke 19:27. In the Preface to the English edition the author comments, “I was not able or willing to ‘look backward’ (Luke 9:62!) to update this volume. . . . It would have distracted my energy from my goal: to finish the commentary in the next few years.” All scholars who have undertaken large writing projects can sympathize with this decision. However, this comment points to a major limitation of the first volume of the Hermeneia commentary on Luke. Although some items have been added to the bibliographies, this volume is basically a publication of 1989, not of 2002. It does not interact with recent scholarship on Luke nor make use of some of the new methodologies of New Testament scholarship. There is a short Introduction, in which I particularly note the lack of an adequate discussion of the genre of Luke. (The continuation of the narrative in Acts, which may or may not fit the same genre as Luke, complicates the genre issue.) Each section of Luke is discussed under three headings: Analysis, Commentary, and Conclusion. In the Analysis Bovon typically discusses the formal structure of the passage and divergences from Mark and/or Matthew (often in detail). The Conclusion (usually brief) attempts to bring into focus the significance of the passage for Christian life and thought or the theological issues that arise from the passage. There are also occasional discussions of the history of interpretation of certain passages (a feature of the Evangelisch—Katholischer Kommentar series, where the heading Wirkungsgeschichte is used). [Full Review]